Know your customer!

April 28th, 2010

We are only days from the election now, and many will be pleased when the election is over. Yesterday the Institute for Fiscal Studies released a report on one of the main reasons. Fake claims. Fudging. Dishonesty.

It is stating the extremely obvious to say we all know that politicians cannot be trusted to be upfront, clear and honest about their plans, about where they will spend and where they will cut. The problem is particularly acute in this election, due to the damage caused by the recent recession, and the corresponding need for major cuts in public spending.

This lack of candour drives us all nuts, so why do they do it? A member of the public commented on Channel Four News yesterday that any politician who breaks the mould and gives us the facts would become very popular for their obvious bravery and honesty. So I repeat, why will they not come clean?

Again, the reason is blindingly obvious. Following the first debate we were shown the results of the official instant poll, and also of the ratings of the “undecideds”. If you missed it, a group of undecided voters were given the opportunity to rate how happy or otherwise they were, about what was being said by each candidate. They gave their ratings in real time. What the ratings clearly showed was, each time a candidate promised more spending, they were popular with the group of undecided voters. And conversely, when a candidate suggested less spending, they immediately became unpopular. 

This is the reality politicians face when targeting undecided voters. Elections are decided by people looking for easy answers. The politician who promises the most usually wins. And so they promise, and promise, and promise. They know their obfuscation annoys us, but they know telling the truth annoys the voters who, once all votes are tallied, decides who lays his head in No 10 for the next five years.

It’s ugly, yes. But give a thought to the politicians. In their ugly business they are doing what we tell delegates on our marketing and presentations skills courses to do; know your customer, know your audience, and deliver what they want.

 Then again, on our marketing courses we also tell our delegates to “under promise, and over deliver”. Gordon. David. Nick. Are you listening?

Kieran Bird

An article a day….

January 26th, 2010

Walking by my local barber on the weekend I noticed it was as busy as ever. Packed with people sitting, looking bored. And I wondered, as I always do, why no-one was reading. I wonder the same thing in the doctors office. And on the tube. Why do people choose to be bored, rather than occupied and enlightened.

 When I ask myself what it is that has had the most positive effect in my career, both in terms of career progression and in terms of enjoyment, that answer is easy. Its reading. Its ongoing learning. Not only have I learned to become a better salesman and marketer, but I have enjoyed it. Reading keeps fresh ideas in my head, and keeps me motivated. It keeps me ENJOYING my job!

 Lots of people say to me “I don’t have time to read. I just never sit down”. Oh really? You never sit down? Well, sorry to be a bit crude, but everyone sits down on an oval seat every day. Read just a couple of pages a day (wherever you are sitting!) to keep getting better at your job. And to keep enjoying it.

What do you read to keep you stimulated?

Kieran Bird

Great minds think alike…but not exactly

January 19th, 2010

Last Friday we sent out the first edition of our new Denny Business Development Digest. The topic was motivation, “The Candle Problem”. Interestingly, last week’s Economist, which also came out on Friday morning, covered the same topic. Click Here

We both looked at some work on motivation done by Karl Duncker and Sam Glucksberg, recently reexamined by Daniel Pink. But according to the Economist article Pink’s argument that “There’s a mismatch between what science knows and what business does” “depends on a highly selective reading of the academic literature”. The Economist article goes on to mention four studies and discusses two in particular. It states that a study of an American glass installation company found that shifting from salaries to incentives increased productivity by 44%. It also states that research on workers at a Chinese electronics factory confirms that performance-related pay is an excellent motivator. But the article misses the point. What the experiments show is, with a simple set of rules, a single, clear solution, and a narrow focus – extrinsic motivators do work. And when only mechanical skills are needed, incentives work. But when cognitive skills are required, a larger reward equals poorer performance. And similarly, when real thinking needs to be done, higher standards equal poorer performance. A glass installation company and workers at an electronics factory. Surely this is mechanical work? As I say, the Economist article appears to miss the point. When setting incentives for work that requires cognitive skills, be wary. Bankers please take note.

 Kieran Bird

SMILE OR DIE

January 13th, 2010

How positive thinking fooled America and the World The new book by Barbara Ehrenreich

This really sad and bitter lady who claims to have carried out scientific research on the subject does a great disservice to scientific research which is used as bedrock for credibility.

Ms Ehrenreich claims that positive thinking is a tyranny, it is a quack theory, it creates a cult like culture and positive thinking has made the world miserable. The book goes even further to denigrate motivation.

Positive thinking and positive communication needs defending. I don’t know of any successful individual in sport – in business – in parenting – in relationships – in human conflict or in any field of human endeavour who would not attribute positive thought to be a major contributor towards their achievements or happiness.

Being positive is a state of mind and a healthy one at that. Just a visit to the Selly Oak Hospital to the ward where our seriously wounded soldiers are being treated will demonstrate the power of positive thinking.

The medical world has for years never understood but willingly embraces the psychosomatic power of healing.

Hear me loud and clear, the most evil, disastrous and catastrophic attitudinal behaviour is negative thinking and negative communication. This is ten times more powerful than positive thought or communication. No claims here based on scientific research but just a wealth of experience in life’s laboratory.

If you think you can you are more likely to, but if you think you can’t, you won’t – cliché! Yes but so what.

Here lies the balance – REALISM. Positive thinking does not move mountains but does move people.

Richard Denny
Author of Succeed for Yourself and Motivate to Win

Resolutions for 2010…and how to keep them

January 7th, 2010

Is all this snow making you dream of a holiday in the sun? And did you happen to see the travel section of the Telegraph on the 3rd of January? The headline of this blog was the headine of their article. A nice little article suggesting some challenges we might like to take on in 2010. However, from my standpoint there was one thing missing. And that’s the subheading, how to keep those resolutions. The article offered the cost of each suggested activity along with a suggested company to approach. What it didn’t offer was advice on how to stick with the resolution, and with all of your resolutions for 2010 and beyond. So here’s my suggestion for you. When we train people we use a variety of methods to make the learning ‘stick’. From this month we are using another simple way to help people stick with their goals. Take a look at pledgehammer.com . It’s a site that allows you to announce your goal, and to publicly state how much you will give to your chosen charity if you fail to stick to your promise to yourself. Get a friend involved to help motivate you. We use line managers in the corporate setting, but a friend will help you will personal goals. So why not take a look at pledeghammer.com . And make 2010 the year you… change your diet, give up smoking, save £X, volunteer for your favourite charity, or just take a lovely holiday in the hot, hot sun….

Kieran Bird

“Do you want ice with that?”

December 1st, 2009

Earlier this year I gave up drinking beer (gluten intolerance, not choice!). So now, I enjoy a pint of cider. Not Strongbow or Blackthorn though, not to my taste. If there’s no local cider, I’ll have a Bulmers or Magners. As you probably know, they are marketed to be drunk with ice. So the bartender asks “Do you want ice with that?” And I answer “NO THANKS!” And they bring me a pint glass full of ice. Why? They don’t listen. They think they already know the answer, they ask the question and don’t listen for the answer. Frustrating! But how much more frustrating is it to find your prospect/customer has not been listening to your benefit statement, or your objection answers? How painful is it? How costly is it? Very! So, let’s remind overselves how to get our prospect/customer/boss/spouse/partner to listen. ASK QUESTIONS. Get your prospect’s mind engaged on his/her favourite topic… him/her self. Ask questions. Engage. Relate. Close!

Kieran Bird

Three Cheers for Tesco!

November 5th, 2009

Tesco are about to embark on a new staff training programme. Over the next 12 months they will be investing £3 million to improve the sales techniques of its store-front workers.

Retail is not an easy business. Low wages and high staff turnover. Because of this retailers are historically poor at staff training. And doesn’t it show! (Would someone PLEASE sell me a pair of shoes, I have been trying to buy a new pair two weekends in a row, with little help from salespeople!)

So, when we see a retailer investing in staff training, we should be thankful.

I repeat. Three cheers for Tesco!

Have you tried “pitching” Salestarget.co.uk?

October 28th, 2009

Have you ever used salestarget.co.uk to find a new sales job? I signed up for some email alerts some time ago, and had not got around to unsubscribing. I’m glad I hadn’t as I recently had a very fun email from them.

Have you seen the email describing their “SELL THAT!” competition? It’s a great idea.

The competition works like this. They have listed a few items that, to put it mildly, don’t belong in the “these products sell themselves” category.

So, how would you sell:

  • An acre on the moon
  • A yellow ‘87 Ford Capri
  • Your colleague
  • An unwanted Christmas gift
  • A timeshare in your hometown

Take a look at the website, and the video entries. Did I mention the prize is £2,000? Might be worth a pitch yourself!

And while you are thinking about your pitch, why not make a list of the questions you might ask a potential buyer of that product. Have fun with your pitch.

And remember, it’s the questions you ask before you pitch that will allow you to close the sale.

Anyone for Leadership?

October 27th, 2009

I’m glad I am “posting” this blog on our website today, and not posting it through the mail. The media keep shouting at us about the “POSTAL STRIKE”. So, who wins?

Let’s take a step back from the emotion of political rhetoric for a minute and look at this rationally. Strikes hurt customers. By hurting customers, they hurt the company, which loses market share. The hurt company then has no choice but to lay off workers.

So strikes hurt customers, companies and workers.

Is there a better way? Perhaps you have heard of cases of unions in (mostly Asian) countries around the world asking their workers to “strike” by going to work wearing black armbands. They made their point. The armbands were a direct insult to the management for not having solved the workers issues. The managers “lost face”. But, the unions did not hurt the customers, nor the company. And so no-one lost their job.

OK, you might say. But what if the current management at the Royal Mail don’t care what the workers think? What if they couldn’t care less about workers wearing black armbands?

Well, that’s a different story. It is the responsibility of leaders to care. Notice I said “leaders” and not “management”? So what’s the difference?

Management is making people do what the managers want them to do. Leadership is making people WANT TO DO IT.

Let’s go back in history and pick out two really great leaders, Sir John Harvey Jones of ICI and Sir Ernest Shackleton the great explorer, both would be highly visible 18 – 20 hours a day talking, mixing and working with their people, certainly not hiding away from the action.

If the staff trust and believe in their bosses and the bosses in turn earn the workers’ loyalty every issue can be resolved. Without strikes.

P.S. Note to Royal Mail management. We teach leadership skills. Our phone number is 01608 653 868. Please call. I’d give you our mailing address, but the mail might be late!

Invest in your people

October 23rd, 2009

Yes, I declare right up front I do have a vested interest here.

The feel good factor for the majority of people got up and went walkabout some 15 months ago and in the intervening months some business have disappeared, some people in work have been on reduced salaries or working part time, and some have even been made redundant, (not good for staff motivation). Values and expectations have changed but here lies a really big opportunity and challenge. Our staff and our people must also change, the skills of winning business (selling) must be improved. If companies are actually going to reap the rewards, management and leadership styles must also be improved and then there is the really biggest opportunity of all – customer care and services.

So come on business leaders if you really now want to make some money and take market share your people will do it for you, up-skill them with the latest communication skills. Invest a little in some really good, and I mean really good training. They will repay this investment 10-50 times over. New usable skills and knowledge are very inspiring so leaders, managers, bosses are you the inhibitor to your company’s growth?